Sowe asked her about the situation. If youre just looking up a coworkers linkedin profile or website to get a sense of their professional background, I think most people would consider that fine. When they go get their lunch. Or youre getting the bio of Engineer Girls cousin, but figure that its the secret down low on Engineer Girl because what are the odds two people could be named Engineer Girl. Google didnt exist yet, and the search engines of the time werent very good. . #5 I think its great to do this! Thats not how it works. But the restructure itself may well have been an attempt to respond to her concerns. I want to say to them, This training you are sending me to is stupid. I agree it is not a perfect analogy because with internet privacy you cant really shut the blinds yet. And if youre trying to find out about someones life through the internet instead of through actually talking to them, the problem is not the internet. That could be anything from a Grubhub gift card and a note to get lunch on you, to stopping by with coffeefor the people elsewhere on campus (maybe do your next one-on-one on their turf and bring it with you), to sending them all some special treat, timed to arrive on the same day as the department pizza party. With his dog. I believe its still there, but not as easily discoverable. It would be worth asking the remote employees if they feel shortchanged because they dont occasionally get to enjoy free food or if they feel the benefits of working from home outweigh getting a slice of pizza or a free cup of coffee every now and then. . Its something that used to be very common but is now less-so. And theyve just pulled something like this again. This person didnt know (because: seriously unqualified for the role) that they were supposed to obtain a copy of proof of said credential upon hiring this person. Thats what were talking about. Thats literally why it exists. Googling someone and looking at 2 or 3 results doesnt mean that youre memorizing every facet of their lives, nor does it mean that you refuse to actually *speak to* them. Nosy people are the worst. But since I dont have one large office to put everyone in, even my on-campus staff are spread out in several locations. If only we could donate all of our swag to teachers and schools that need it. my lying coworker claimed someone said I couldnt eat at my desk, telling recruiters I wont move to states that discriminate, AirTag etiquette, and more. LW 3: you sound all BEC with this job and company. And how far back do you look about that and how deep? But on social media where you explicitly post things for public consumption you should not be surprised someone looked at your posts. Yes, that bit sounded strange to me too. You had to opt in. Of course people vent in letters to AAM and many of them will behave professionally at all times at work (or as much as is humanly possible), but those were fairly harsh and judgemental sentiments even for a vent, and genuine concerns, such as your manager not meeting with you even when you try to schedule meetings (! The AAM commentary sometimes reinforces some bad ideas that are not really norms, avoiding talking to your coworkers seems to be one of them. Not to mention that resumes are usually written for an audience of a hiring manager rather than a direct report. I mean, most peoples addresses are easy to find online, and everyone used to have a list of them arrive at their house. (Googling personal data for legitimate hiring purposes obviously falls under a different umbrella.). Right now Im honestly just hoping that my new boss wont last long at this job. Itll have pics of the inside from the most recent sale, and how much it cost. Whereas the OP whom Facebook connected over to their distant coworkers post on the patio sets for sale board as selling a patio set because she was moving, the advice was to act like she hadnt seen it rather than tell everyone coworker must be quitting because she was about to move. Dont post it. But overall it just sounds like the OP is so deeply unhappy that maybe its time to look for something else. So reading LinkedIn profiles is fine because that is what the person *wants* people to know about them professionally. If this is a lunch and learn being held AT the company, surely they know that lunch is being served? Pens and notepads usually fall under that amount. But even with that stuff I knew not to bring anything up I found from my search when I talked to them. (Well, I am sometimes tempted to see if any of them regularly post pictures of their dogs on public social media pages, because some of them have pretty awesome dogs. While they wear comfy clothes at home and have 0 commute. If you, a user, are seeing something on social media, that is probably stuff a private person (maybe not the right person, but a person who doesnt work for the social media company) consented to have public, at least in theory. I know its petty, and like I said, I wouldnt say anything, but when I was dealing with traffic during my commute or spending my evening doing laundry I could have done during the day, Id feel like I got the short end of the stick. I used to work in the head office of a large company, the head office had about 100 staff and we had several smaller regional offices dotted across the country but only about 10 staff based across those. It was a fun treat and the remote people felt included. If you search for my name plus my field, youll get my profile on my employers website, and my LinkedIn and thats about it. Instead, I found out that the boss daughter had been viciously murdered by her husband, and just what they could print in the paper was complete nightmare fuel. I also brought my laptop to the party and called him on Skype so he could hang out with everyone (which isnt really normally how we handle remote people usually we just do audio calls). I finally understand why companies give away branded pens. I seem to be in the minority on this, even moreso now. Because I didnt consent to have any of that information available. I thought you meant personally! You will encounter the following words as you read "The Immigrant Contribution." Before reading, note how familiar you are with each word. To me, its a lot more like someone is wearing a cow costume underneath their loose fit regular clothes so that you can see it poking out a little around the neckline. Re Remote workers Way too much. Agreed. I dont have any moral concerns with googling people, or with others googling me. They cannot help their own (in the US) agism. They organize a ton of social after-hours type events for on-site employees so getting something special made me feel like I had my own alternate way to celebrate even though Im not there. By what authority to they propose to impose fraud penalties on you? Learning later that the HR rep and my director were tight, I feared the worst. If you are doing something surreptitiously, like a small child eating a tootsie roll behind the door, its generally because you know you actually shouldnt be doing the thing. Agreed. I would feel quite violated if random Jane/John looked me up on Google, made an assumption, probably thought it *wasnt* me, but still has that awkward look when Im around, iykwim? 1 person turned out to be using a pic of one of Hugh Heffners wives! Thats similar to my (and many peoples) response to the previous snooping letter, and I think it works for a lot of such situations. But it would be creepy if they walked right up to your window and cupped their hands on the glass to peer in, or climbed up a tree to get a better view into the second level of your house, or used binoculars to get a closer look. So if I want to do a crazy dance in a cow costume in my bedroom with the blinds open I imagine that someone is looking and maybe even recording me. But I was also clear with my kids (especially my daughters, because their risks are higher) about the dangers of various perfectly legitimate activities. Then the editor (20 years later) decided to put it all out on the internet. She was a VP and I was a director with a large team but she wasnt very effective and they thought these would help her, they didnt. And when they give out swag (and his company does awesome swag really nice blankets, those amazing steel water bottles that keep stuff cold all day, nice bluetooth headphones and stuff) they mail the swag out to the home gang. A lot of my high school accomplishments were featured in the local paper which now has all its archives online. All that is required to find this stuff is firstname lastname city state. Hi, OP what youre describing here is pretty typical, and could be one of the few good things LinkedIn can do. I am in a role supervising a team of multimedia instructional designers. To use your example, I assume at least one of my acquaintances has scrolled back through Facebook a few years. And if that doesnt turn up anything, its on to speculation and rumor spreading because nobody could be that boring, and there must be SOMETHING. It also makes the company MORE vulnerable, rather than less. And for the next five years? I still have no interest in any of them; maybe I am too old?). There are things I used to be an expert in but dont recall currently because Im focused on the current project/programming language. 9 comments. Maybe its time to try again. That was supposed to be the big attraction, the great value. I thought, Oh, what cool community thing did Boss Lady ended up in the paper for? and clicked. In the internet age, real privacy where no one can find out personally things about you even if they really, really try is an illusion unless youre willing to sacrifice participation in a lot of society, and even then maybe not. I do think it can happen (though it shouldnt) i.e. She eventually resigned, and on her last day she sent an email to the All Staff list to say there were chocolates and sweets in the kitchenbut not the head office one, even though she was spending her last day there. Please dont. We just had to send her the receipt. Not only is that shady, its outright idiotic. Sure, its technically not my house yet, but Im under contract; so while its probably not legally trespassing, its essentially walking into someone elses house uninvited and is creepy AF. You actually had to know UNIX to get to things. It was a horrible setup for so many reasons and my de facto supervisor was a misogynist with control issues. Because they looked something up that is publicly available? In the new digital age there is new fear of someone trying to purposely smear your reputation, by creating a fake online profile of someone and posting all kinds of questionable and inappropriate content. The nicer ones were, if I was in the mood, occasionally given a short speech about folks with shotguns in Idaho who did not take kindly to uninvited strangers parking in front of their house and staring or taking photos. Why do you care so much? You are in public and everyone can see what you do. To me its not so much about what they see, its about their choosing to look more than incidentally even if all I was doing was just sitting in a chair reading a book. And benevolent acquaintances do not do that kind of intensive search, so if you are doing it, I have to assume that you have some malicious interest in doing so. 9. Keeps things interesting! But when I do post I imagine that anyone and everyone is going to see it. If a coworker googles me to get my work history, thats fine. I have had two bosses snoop around social media looking if I have a presence. but Ill never negotiate against my own hire. Even if information about is posted by you in a public forum, some ways of engaging with it can be creepy. Having been slightly underpaid at my previous company, I have been taking courses on salary negotiation tactics. Hmmm, what did you say your username was on FetLife again?. The search results could be something the new CW posted herself. Anything you could call research is an overstep. Both systems pick up the authentication information they need from the DNS (domain name service), the service they already use to look up IP addresses. No valid professional reason. *eye roll*. For #1, I think the key questions are Is it business-related? and Is it clearly intended as public knowledge?. With my name still attached. First page of results was a woman from my hometown with those same three names that had recently done prison time for money laundering, fraud, identity theft, etc. I really like my job overall and I work in a very specialized profession so I dont have many options and dont want to leave. But you are kind of giving a blanket I can look at anything personal statment. I think it definitely depends on the salary of the employee in question, and also Id suggest that gift cards or something of the sort are preferable to reimbursement for meals, because for me, the cost of a $10 takeout order is DEFINITELY not worth the hassle of putting in an expense report. Of course I Google themI want to see their site! Fruit- Tomatoes are a fruit, so unless you never get tomato sauce on your pizza youre a liar. Wow! And honestly that hasnt happened to me in quite some time. Its not going to change. Back then it was way more private kind of hidden in its own little corner. I knew of someone where their prior immigration status (think F-1 to OPT) was disclosed by a prev. Honestly, I cant really imagine searching them, unless they told me they had a DeviantArt page or something. Maybe this has been answered before but in regards to taking something on your lunch break, what about after work, but on a work trip? Yeah, the combination of research tendencies and openly posted CVs makes for very different expectations. Shes still there and I am gone. Me either. However, I would be creeped out if a professional contact brought up that article in a conversation. These are small items that almost certainly fall beneath any you cant accept/must report gifts of over $X rules your company has (although you can check that to be sure). After all, plenty of very experienced managers are bad managers. It would have made a financial difference to me when I was younger and a free lunch was a big deal. I am not pro-tell everyone everything in fact I am quite the opposite, I am an I dont post anything online that I dont want the whole world to see person. Other people dont have anything remarkable. UberEats and Postmates dont cover this area. Going down the rabbit hole and spending hours digging to learn really personal things is. At least two of my past addresses show up when I google myself and Ive never explicitly put them online because that would be risky. He was a temp/contract worker hired from a service, so I dont know who was supposed to do a background check, but yeah, the ball was dropped multiple times. Fist day of current job one of my coworkers looks at me and says You dont have Facebook we googled you last week. Its kind of the norm now. Its always fun to see whos disgusted by the anchovies and whos grossed out by the olives. I know enough for friendly chit-chat and thats it. Theres stuff on the internet about me that I didnt actually opt into though. #3. Our workgroup sometimes spends their whole shift in company vehicles. So I am able to take care of everyone on campus. But I get that you think that level of curiosity is bad, so nosey makes sense from you. I dont want people chastised because they asked me a question they find intellectually interesting. There was one time where my personal twitter (that I honestly forgot I had, I never used it) got hacked and for about a week was doing nothing but streaming porn links. Thats part of the reason Id give her a pass on it, and just make sure to head it off for next time. The folks who think that Googling someones professional info are really confusing me. Not talking about a quick Google search, but a deep dive. I always felt like free stuff at work was part of the trade-off for a commute, loud chewing neighbors, dressing up, and working in a cubicle farm. Whatever. And When you install this update, it will send alerts to everyone in your contacts about what song youre listening to and webpage youre looking at RIGHT NOW! Omigod turn that off. But you people said you wanted to use the web to connect.. Be very careful in looking a social media in hiring, because you might unintentionally learn things that should not be taken into account in hiring, and that could be risky for the entity. But if youre going to do it, you need to be very careful not to spread gossipat the risk of damaging their reputation, and your own. #1: I think the golden ruledo unto others as you would have them do unto youapplies here. They dont stop. Agree. How can I better understand what my manager wants from me when she will not speak to me?. Youre seeing it all on purpose. Its time for you to educate yourself. Social media is not privacy. Along with rechargeable accounts. Keeping your reading focused on professional material is a good boundary, but not all Twitter feeds, LinkedIn profiles, blogs, etc. It just is. A lot of colleges and universities now have policies now that range from the draconian (youre not allowed to accept anything from a vendor, even a .50 cent pen) to more reasonable (if its out on a table, you can take it, but nothing thats a special gift, meals under a certain $ amount).

Serial Killers Being Released In 2021, Meindl Conditioner And Proofer How To Use, Path Of Sin The One That Got Away Walkthrough, Skill And Ability Definition Gcse Pe, Cultures That Settled In The Northeast Region, Articles C